Why couldnt a piece of that.
This process is as much about YOU as it is about the text you are responding to. As a scholar you stand in judgment over the text. You will be asked to explore why you like or dislike the reading, explain whether you agree or disagree with the author, identify the reading's purpose, and critique the text.
There is no right or wrong answer to a reader response. Nonetheless, it is important that you demonstrate an understanding of the reading and clearly explain and support your reactions. Thus, do NOT summarize the contents of the text at length.
Instead, take a systematic, analytical approach to the text. Then, try to answer ALL of the questions below.
What does the text have to do with you, personally, and with your life past, present or future? It is not acceptable to write that the text has NOTHING to do with you, since just about everything humans can write has to do in some way with every other human.
How much does the text agree or clash with your view of the world, and what you consider right and wrong? Use several quotes as examples of how it agrees with and supports what you think about the world, about right and wrong, and about what you think it is to be human.
Use quotes and examples to discuss how the text disagrees with what you think about the world and about right and wrong.
Did the text communicate with you? Why or why not? Give examples of how your views might have changed or been strengthened or perhaps, of why the text failed to convince you, the way it is. Please do not write "I agree with everything the author wrote," since everybody disagrees about something, even if it is a tiny point.
Use quotes to illustrate your points of challenge, or where you were persuaded, or where it left you cold. How well does it address things that you, personally, care about and consider important to the world?
How does it address things that are important to your family, your community, your ethnic group, to people of your economic or social class or background, or your faith tradition? If not, who does or did the text serve? Did it pass the "Who cares? Use quotes to illustrate. Reading and writing "critically" does not mean the same thing as "criticizing," in everyday language complaining or griping, fault-finding, nit-picking.
Your "critique" can and should be positive and praise the text if possible, as well as pointing out problems, disagreements and shortcomings. How well did you enjoy the text or not as entertainment or as a work of art?
Use quotes or examples to illustrate the quality of the text as art or entertainment. Of course, be aware that some texts are not meant to be entertainment or art--a news report or textbook, for instance, may be neither entertaining or artistic, but may still be important and successful.
To sum up, what is your overall reaction to the text? Would you read something else like this, or by this author, in the future or not?
To whom would you recommend this text? Your first draft is just that, and you should expect to re-write your work several times before you consider it completed. · The POPL’15 author response period just ended a few days ago, and now submitted papers are in their final stages of review.
Author response, a.k.a. author rebuttal, is a feature of conference review processes that allows authors to respond to claims made by reviewers prior to the final decision being benjaminpohle.com idea goes back at least as far as ISMM’06 in the PL community, but perhaps even benjaminpohle.com Unlike in more formal writing, the use of phrases like "I thought" and "I believe" is encouraged in a response paper.
You'll still have a thesis and will need to back up your opinion with evidence from the work, but this type of paper spotlights your individual reaction as a reader or viewer. Writing a Reaction or Response Essay: A reaction/response paper has an introduction, a body, and a conclusion.
The introduction should contain all the basic information in one or two paragraphs. Sentence 1: This sentence . Sep 17, · A reaction or response paper requires the writer to analyze a text, then develop commentary related to it.
It is a popular academic assignment because it requires thoughtful reading, research, and writing.
Writing a response paper means that you may choose to write about your own reaction to the essay as a whole or you may choose to write about a particular point or points made by the author. Whatever you choose to focus on, the response must be critical, not simply a benjaminpohle.com Posts Unteaching the five paragraph essay response paper. Unteaching the five paragraph essay response paper writing an essay correctly impressive experience essay essay education system in japan litteraturens betydning essay writing references research paper apa citations dissertation length of conclusion of air egne menninger i essays benjaminpohle.com A response is a critique or evaluation of the author's essay. Unlike the summary, it is composed of YOUR opinions in relation to the article being summarized. It examines ideas that you agree or disagree with and identifies the essay's strengths and weaknesses in reasoning and logic, in quality of supporting examples, and in organization and style.
You can learn how to write a reaction paper by following these writing tips%(). This article will tell you all about how to look through your book for the keys to writing a response paper.
You will learn what makes for a good outline and how that leads to a first then final benjaminpohle.com://benjaminpohle.com Aug 16, · However, unlike a review or evaluation paper, your purpose in a response paper is not to tell someone else whether or not they should read this article. Instead, your purpose is to explain your reaction and to give reasons (this will be the body of your paper) why you reacted that benjaminpohle.coms: